The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): A Comprehensive Review of Scoring, Reliability, and Accuracy

1. Introduction to the RAADS-R:

The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) is an 80-item self-report questionnaire that serves as an instrument to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in adults 1. Developed by Riva Ariella Ritvo and her colleagues, this revised scale addresses the increasing recognition of autism in adulthood and the consequent need for assessment tools specifically designed for this population 1. The RAADS-R is an adaptation of the original Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale (RAADS), which consisted of 78 questions 2. This evolution reflects an ongoing effort to refine the assessment of autistic traits in adults for improved diagnostic utility. The RAADS-R is intended for use with individuals aged 18 and over who possess average or above-average intelligence, typically defined as having an IQ score above 80 1. This cognitive criterion suggests that the test is designed for individuals who have the capacity for introspection and can comprehend the nuanced nature of the questionnaire items.

The original RAADS was developed to address a notable deficiency in screening and diagnostic tools specifically designed for adults with ASD 1. Recognizing the unique challenges in identifying autism in adults, the developers aimed to create a measure that could assist clinicians in this complex diagnostic process. The subsequent revision to the RAADS-R involved a thorough review of the initial scale, incorporating findings from factor analysis to enhance its structure and content 1. This revision led to the inclusion of a fourth symptom area, circumscribed interests, the addition of two new questions, and clarifications in the wording of several existing items 1. The original RAADS primarily focused on assessing developmental pathology across three key symptom areas: language, social relatedness, and sensory-motor functioning, aligning with the diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) 1. The inclusion of circumscribed interests as a distinct domain in the RAADS-R underscores the growing understanding of this characteristic as a core feature of ASD.

The primary purpose of the RAADS-R is to serve as a valuable resource for clinicians in the diagnostic evaluation of ASD in adults, particularly for individuals who may have gone undiagnosed earlier in life or who present with a less typical or "subclinical" manifestation of autistic traits 1. By focusing on identifying critical behaviors and characteristics associated with autism, the RAADS-R contributes to a more precise and comprehensive diagnostic assessment 5. It is essential to understand that the RAADS-R is designed to be used in conjunction with clinical expertise and alongside other assessment procedures; it is not intended to function as a standalone diagnostic tool that can provide a definitive diagnosis of ASD 3. The RAADS-R is specifically targeted towards adults aged 18 and over who have demonstrated average to above-average intellectual abilities 1. The test is typically administered as a self-report questionnaire, often under the supervision of a qualified clinician in a clinical setting 3. While it can be taken in various formats, including online or in person, it is explicitly not intended for self-diagnosis, and its results should always be interpreted by a trained professional 3.

2. RAADS-R Test Scoring:

The RAADS-R consists of 80 statements, each accompanied by four response options that are framed to reflect a developmental perspective: "True now and when I was young," "True now only," "True only when I was younger than 16," and "Never true" 3. The scoring of these responses varies depending on whether the statement is considered to reflect an autistic or a neurotypical characteristic. For the majority of the statements (63), which are indicative of autistic traits, the scoring is as follows: "True now and when I was young" is awarded 3 points, "True now only" receives 2 points, "True only when I was younger than 16" is given 1 point, and "Never true" receives 0 points 11. This scoring system places greater weight on traits that have been present throughout the individual's life, aligning with the developmental nature of ASD. However, for 17 specific "normative" questions, which reflect characteristics more commonly associated with neurotypical individuals, the point values are reversed 11. For these items, "True now and when I was young" receives 0 points, "True now only" receives 1 point, "True only when I was younger than 16" receives 2 points, and "Never true" receives 3 points. This reversed scoring mechanism helps to ensure that endorsing common neurotypical experiences does not inadvertently contribute to a higher overall score indicative of autism.

The total score on the RAADS-R is calculated by summing the points obtained from all 80 items, resulting in a possible range from 0 to 240 3. A total score of 65 or higher is generally considered to be consistent with behaviors and symptoms associated with ASD and can provide supporting evidence for a clinical diagnosis 3. Research studies conducted during the validation of the RAADS-R indicated that no neurotypical individuals within the study samples scored above 64, making a score of 65 a significant threshold for potential ASD 4. Conversely, a score below 65 suggests a lower likelihood of ASD, although it is important to note that it does not definitively rule out the possibility of the condition 7. It is critical to understand that the RAADS-R is not a definitive diagnostic tool, and the total score should always be interpreted within the broader context of a comprehensive clinical evaluation that includes other sources of information 3.

The RAADS-R is also organized into four subscales, each designed to assess distinct domains of autistic characteristics: Social Relatedness Problems, Circumscribed Interests, Language, and Sensory Motor 2. The Social Relatedness Problems subscale, which contains 39 questions, evaluates the individual's difficulties in social interaction, including aspects such as understanding social cues, forming and maintaining relationships, and experiencing empathy and social reciprocity 3. The Circumscribed Interests subscale, comprising 14 statements, explores the presence of intense, focused interests or preoccupations, as well as the tendency to engage in repetitive behaviors and experience distress related to unexpected changes 2. The Language subscale, which includes 7 questions, focuses on atypical language use, such as the frequent use of phrases from media in conversation, and difficulties in understanding non-literal language 2. Finally, the Sensory Motor subscale, containing 20 statements, assesses the individual's experiences with sensory sensitivities, engagement in self-stimulatory behaviors, and the presence of atypical speech patterns or tone of voice 2.

In addition to the total score, the scores obtained on each of the four subscales can provide further valuable insights into an individual's specific areas of difficulty. Threshold scores have been suggested for each subscale to indicate potentially significant levels of autistic traits within those domains: a score above 30 on the Social Relatedness subscale, above 14 on the Circumscribed Interests subscale, above 3 on the Language subscale, and above 15 on the Sensory Motor subscale 4. Exceeding these subscale thresholds can highlight particular areas where the individual reports a higher frequency or intensity of autistic traits, which can be informative even if the total RAADS-R score is not definitively above the diagnostic cutoff 4. Research has consistently demonstrated significant differences in average RAADS-R total scores between autistic and neurotypical adults. Studies have reported mean total scores for autistic individuals ranging from approximately 133.81 (SD = 37.72) to 138.46 (SD = 41.4) 4. Conversely, the average total score for neurotypical adults is considerably lower, typically around 25.95 (SD = 16.04) 4. It has also been observed that average scores can vary based on factors such as gender and diagnostic status 11. For example, some studies suggest that autistic females might score slightly higher on average than autistic males 11. To further facilitate the interpretation of RAADS-R scores, percentile scores are often calculated. These scores allow for a comparison of an individual's results to the distribution of scores obtained from both neurotypical and autistic reference groups 4. For instance, a normative percentile of 80 would indicate that the individual's score is higher than 80 percent of the neurotypical comparison group 4. The established cutoff score of 65 falls above the 99th percentile for neurotypical individuals but around the 3rd percentile for adults diagnosed with autism 4. The following table summarizes the average RAADS-R total and subscale scores for different groups:

3. Reliability of the RAADS-R:

In psychological assessment, reliability is a critical psychometric property that refers to the consistency and stability of a test's results. A reliable test should yield similar scores when administered repeatedly to the same individual over time, assuming no genuine change in the underlying trait being measured. This consistency is essential for ensuring that the test is providing a dependable measure of the intended construct.

The RAADS-R has demonstrated strong reliability through various measures, including test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Test-retest reliability assesses the stability of scores over time. Multiple studies have reported high test-retest reliability coefficients for the RAADS-R, typically ranging from 0.80 to 0.987 2. For instance, a study on the Swedish version of the RAADS-R found a significant positive correlation (r = 0.80) in total scores when the test was administered twice to adults with ASD within a 3- to 6-month period 2. Furthermore, another validation study reported an exceptionally high test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.987 4. These findings indicate that the RAADS-R provides a stable and dependable measure of autistic traits in adults, suggesting that an individual's score is likely to remain consistent over time in the absence of significant interventions or life changes. Internal consistency, which refers to the extent to which the different items within a test measure the same underlying construct, has also been evaluated for the RAADS-R. Cronbach's coefficient alpha, a common statistic for assessing internal consistency, has been estimated at 0.92 in the ASD group and 0.94 in comparison cases for the total RAADS-R scale 2. These high alpha values suggest a strong degree of homogeneity among the test items, indicating that they are generally measuring a similar set of characteristics related to autism. While the internal consistency of the four subscales varies, with the Social Interaction and Sensory Motor subscales showing high consistency (alpha around 0.80s) and the Circumscribed Interests subscale demonstrating moderate consistency (alpha around 0.73), the overall scale exhibits good internal consistency 2. The Language subscale initially showed lower internal consistency (alpha around 0.58), but research suggests that removing one specific item could improve its homogeneity 2.

4. Accuracy and Validity of the RAADS-R:

In diagnostic testing, accuracy and validity are crucial concepts. Accuracy refers to the test's ability to correctly classify individuals as having or not having the condition of interest, often measured by sensitivity and specificity. Validity, on the other hand, concerns the extent to which the test measures what it is intended to measure. For the RAADS-R, this means how well it assesses autistic traits in adults.

The RAADS-R has generally demonstrated good accuracy, as evidenced by its sensitivity and specificity rates reported in various validation studies. Sensitivity, which is the test's ability to correctly identify individuals with ASD, has been reported to be between 91% and 97% at the commonly used cutoff score of 65 2. This indicates that the RAADS-R is effective at identifying a high proportion of individuals who have ASD. Specificity, which is the test's ability to correctly identify individuals without ASD, has been reported to range from 93% to 100% in these studies 2. The finding of 100% specificity in some studies suggests that no neurotypical individuals in those samples scored above the diagnostic cutoff. However, one study that evaluated the RAADS-R as a screening tool in a clinical setting reported a high sensitivity of 100% but a much lower specificity of only 3.03% 19. This finding suggests that while the test was effective at identifying all individuals who were eventually diagnosed with ASD in that sample, it also flagged a large number of individuals who did not receive an ASD diagnosis, indicating a high rate of false positives in that particular context.

The validity of the RAADS-R is further supported by its comparison with other established diagnostic tools. Concurrent validity, which assesses how well a test's results correlate with those of other measures of the same construct, has been found to be high for the RAADS-R. For example, it has shown a strong concurrent validity of 96% with the Social Responsiveness Scale - Adult (SRS-A) 4. This high correlation indicates that the RAADS-R is measuring similar aspects of social communication and interaction deficits as the SRS-A. Additionally, a study conducted in the Netherlands found that the RAADS-R correctly identified ASD in 80% of cases and demonstrated high sensitivity when compared to the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ), another commonly used autism screening measure 13. The RAADS-R has also been the subject of various international validation studies. It has been translated and validated in multiple languages, including Swedish and French, demonstrating good psychometric properties and diagnostic accuracy across different cultural contexts 2. The original validation study involved research centers on three continents, indicating a broad effort to establish the scale's reliability and validity in diverse populations 1.

Despite its generally positive psychometric properties, research has also identified certain limitations and potential biases associated with the RAADS-R. One study from 2021 suggested that the RAADS-R "lacks predictive validity" when used as a self-report screening tool prior to a comprehensive diagnostic assessment 4. This research found no significant association between RAADS-R scores and the eventual clinical diagnostic outcome in adults who were referred for ASD evaluation 19. Furthermore, a 2018 article indicated that the RAADS-R might be less sensitive in identifying autism symptoms that are more prevalent or presented differently in women, who are often perceived to exhibit fewer overt social difficulties compared to men 4. The unique four-point ordinal response scale used in the RAADS-R, with its developmental perspective, has also been raised as a potential psychometric concern, with some questions about the interpretability and ordering of the response options 14. Variability in the reported sensitivity and specificity of the RAADS-R across different studies, particularly when attempting to differentiate between individuals with an autism diagnosis and those with other psychiatric conditions, also raises some concerns about its utility as a standalone diagnostic screening tool 14. Additionally, some research has suggested that the RAADS-R may have a tendency to produce a higher number of false positives (lower specificity) in certain populations or when its results are considered in isolation 13. Given these limitations, the prevailing view in the field is that the RAADS-R is best utilized as a valuable tool to assist clinicians in the diagnostic process for adult ASD, providing important self-reported information about autistic-like traits across various domains 3. It is consistently emphasized that the RAADS-R should not be used as a substitute for a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and a clinical diagnosis, when it differs from the test score, should always take precedence 11. Ultimately, no single test, including the RAADS-R, can provide a definitive diagnosis of ASD in isolation. A thorough assessment necessitates the integration of information from multiple sources, including clinical interviews, behavioral observations, a detailed review of developmental history, and potentially input from family members or other informants 3.

5. Administering and Interpreting the RAADS-R:

The RAADS-R is typically administered as a written questionnaire, which can be completed either online or in person 6. It is generally recommended that the test be taken under the supervision of a qualified healthcare professional, such as a psychologist or psychiatrist, who can provide guidance, answer any questions the individual may have, and ensure that the questionnaire is completed accurately 3. During the test, individuals are asked to read each of the 80 statements carefully and select the response option that best reflects their experiences, taking into account whether the statement was true now and when they were young, true only now, true only when they were younger than 16, or never true 3. The time required to complete the RAADS-R can vary depending on the individual's reading speed and how much time they take to reflect on each question, but it typically ranges from approximately 13 minutes to an hour 4.

Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in guiding individuals through the RAADS-R administration process and ensuring its accurate completion 15. They can provide clear instructions on how to fill out the questionnaire and offer clarification if the individual has any questions or finds certain items confusing 15. The interpretation of the RAADS-R results should always be performed by a qualified clinician who has the expertise to consider the individual's medical history, developmental background, and other relevant clinical information 6. While the cutoff score of 65 serves as a general guideline for indicating a higher likelihood of ASD, it is important to remember that the specific interpretation of scores can sometimes vary slightly depending on the particular research study or the specific clinical context in which the test is being used 7. For the RAADS-R to yield the most meaningful results, it is essential that individuals answer the questions honestly and as accurately as possible, reflecting on their typical behaviors and experiences throughout their lives 16. However, several factors can potentially challenge the accuracy of self-report measures like the RAADS-R. Individuals who have low reflective capacity or limited insight into their own behaviors might underestimate their autistic traits and consequently score lower on the test than might be expected based on other clinical observations 4. Conversely, some individuals might inadvertently over-report certain traits due to factors such as anxiety or a pre-existing belief about their condition. The standardization study for the RAADS-R also noted that some autistic individuals, particularly those in their late teens and early twenties, might not acknowledge the presence of certain symptoms that are readily apparent to their family members or to the clinicians evaluating them 11. Furthermore, cultural and linguistic factors can influence how individuals interpret and respond to the questions, potentially introducing bias into the results 18. Additionally, some individuals might simply misinterpret or misunderstand the intended meaning of certain items on the questionnaire 13.

6. Conclusion:

In summary, the Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) is a valuable 80-item self-report questionnaire designed to assist clinicians in the diagnosis of ASD in adults. It utilizes a unique scoring system that includes developmentally framed response options and a reversed scoring approach for neurotypical items, ultimately providing a total score and scores across four key subscales. A total score of 65 or higher generally indicates a higher likelihood of autism. The RAADS-R has demonstrated strong test-retest reliability and good internal consistency, suggesting that it is a stable and consistent measure of autistic traits. Initial validation studies reported promising sensitivity and specificity rates, indicating good diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between autistic and neurotypical adults. However, more recent research has pointed out certain limitations, particularly concerning its predictive validity as a standalone screening tool and potential biases related to gender and the diverse ways in which autism can manifest.

Despite these limitations, the RAADS-R remains a significant tool in the assessment of ASD in adults. It offers a standardized and relatively efficient method for gathering self-reported information about autistic-like traits across crucial domains, aligning with current diagnostic criteria. Its utility is particularly notable in identifying individuals with subtle presentations of autism or those who were not diagnosed during childhood. Nevertheless, it is essential to emphasize that the RAADS-R should not be used as the sole determinant for an ASD diagnosis in adults. An accurate diagnosis necessitates a comprehensive clinical evaluation that incorporates clinical interviews, behavioral observations, a thorough review of the individual's developmental history, and potentially input from other knowledgeable sources. Clinicians must exercise their professional judgment to interpret the RAADS-R results within the broader context of all available information to arrive at a well-informed and accurate diagnosis, ultimately leading to the development of appropriate support and intervention plans tailored to the individual's specific needs.

REF：

1. The Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R): A Scale to Assist the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Adults: An International Validation Study - PMC,  15, 2025， https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3134766/

2. The Swedish Version of the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale: Revised (RAADS-R). A Validation Study of a Rating Scale for Adults - PMC,  15, 2025， https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3217140/

3. RAADS-R Test: Understanding the Test for Better Results,  15, 2025， https://abacentersfl.com/blog/raads-r-test/

4. Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale – Revised (RAADS-R ...,  15, 2025， https://novopsych.com.au/assessments/diagnosis/ritvo-autism-asperger-diagnostic-scale-revised-raads-r/

5. RAADS-R Autism Test: History and Definitions - ABA Centers of America,  15, 2025， https://www.abacenters.com/raads-r-autism-test-history-and-definitions/

6. RAADS-R Test Results | Above and Beyond Therapy,  15, 2025， https://www.abtaba.com/blog/raads-r-test-results

7. Uncovering Autistic Tendencies: The Power of the Raads-R Test - Yellow Bus ABA,  15, 2025， https://www.yellowbusaba.com/post/raads-r-test

8. RAADS-R Test: Shedding Light on Autism Spectrum Disorder | Rising Above ABA,  15, 2025， https://www.risingaboveaba.com/autism-blog/raads-r-test

9. www.abacenters.com,  15, 2025， https://www.abacenters.com/raads-r-autism-test-history-and-definitions/#:~:text=The%20RAADS%2DR%20test%20functions,Social%20relatedness

10. What To Know About The RAADS-R Test For Autism - Augmentive,  15, 2025， https://augmentive.io/blog/raads-r-test-autism

11. RAADS–R | Embrace Autism,  15, 2025， https://embrace-autism.com/raads-r/

12. RAADS-R Autism Testing | Questions - Answers | ABA Centers of America,  15, 2025， https://www.abacenters.com/raads-r-test-for-autism/

13. Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale - Wikipedia,  15, 2025， https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritvo_Autism_and_Asperger_Diagnostic_Scale

14. Psychometric exploration of the RAADS-R with autistic adults: Implications for research and clinical practice - Alexandra Sturm, Sijia Huang, Vanessa Bal, Ben Schwartzman, 2024 - Sage Journals,  15, 2025， https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13623613241228329

15. Understanding the RAADS-R Test: A Guide for Parents - Blue ABA,  15, 2025， https://blueabatherapy.com/autism/raads-r-test/

16. RAADS-R Test for Autism - Ambitions ABA Therapy,  15, 2025， https://www.ambitionsaba.com/resources/raads-r-test

17. RAADS-R - TheraPlatform,  15, 2025， https://www.theraplatform.com/blog/999/raads-r

18. Understanding the RAADS-R Test for Autism - AutismCOE,  15, 2025， https://autismcoe.com/blog/autism-tests/understanding-the-raads-r-test-for-autism/

19. The Effectiveness of RAADS-R as a Screening Tool for Adult ASD Populations - PMC,  15, 2025， https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8452438/

20. Study shows that RAADS-R, a popular self-DX is accurate at determining if someone is autistic. : r/autism - Reddit,  15, 2025， https://www.reddit.com/r/autism/comments/1ajj72h/study_shows_that_raadsr_a_popular_selfdx_is/

Powered by wisp